Thursday, December 08, 2005
Critical friends
At yesterday’s faculty meeting, a group of teachers modeled the process of participating in a Critical Friends Group (CFG) in the context of Looking at Student Work (LASW). If you can get through the jargon, the combination of CFG and LASW provides a valuable pair of related techniques: educators help each other out in a collegial, even collaborative spirit, by examining what one teacher (the “presenter”) is trying to accomplish and by looking at the work of students in the presenter’s class. Note that “critical” in this context means that the friends are essential or important, not that they criticize.
In this particular exercise, the presenter was a fellow math teacher who was sharing student work on a game theory problem. The participants were teachers from all five of the major academic departments: math, science, English, history, and foreign language. Even though the math problem under consideration was interdisciplinary and involved reading and analyzing an article from USA Today, it was still difficult for non-math people to understand.
The process is highly structured — partly to reduce the likelihood of personal comments and the defensiveness that would surely result from such comments, and partly to ensure that talking is balanced by sufficient listening. It looked convincing to me. I would like to be a participant in such a group, but I wonder how it’s possible to understand one another’s discipline and values in order to make the process more meaningful.
In this particular exercise, the presenter was a fellow math teacher who was sharing student work on a game theory problem. The participants were teachers from all five of the major academic departments: math, science, English, history, and foreign language. Even though the math problem under consideration was interdisciplinary and involved reading and analyzing an article from USA Today, it was still difficult for non-math people to understand.
The process is highly structured — partly to reduce the likelihood of personal comments and the defensiveness that would surely result from such comments, and partly to ensure that talking is balanced by sufficient listening. It looked convincing to me. I would like to be a participant in such a group, but I wonder how it’s possible to understand one another’s discipline and values in order to make the process more meaningful.
Labels: teaching and learning
ARCHIVES
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- July 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009